--- description: Hanki yksityiskohtaista tietoa koskien tuotteen Miro käytettävyyttä, ominaisuuksia, hintaa, hyötyjä ja huonoja puolia vahvistettujen käyttäjäkokemusten avulla. Lue arvosteluja ja löydä samankaltaisia työkaluja. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Miro Hinta, arvostelut ja arvosanat - Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [Kotisivu](/) > [Yhteistyö-ohjelmisto](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Miro](/software/128955/miro) # Miro Canonical: https://www.capterra.fi/software/128955/miro Page: 1 / 69\ Seuraava: [Next page](https://www.capterra.fi/software/128955/miro?page=2) > Verkkopohjainen valkotaulutyökalu, joka on tiimien ykkösvalinta tulokselliseen yhteistyöhön. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 1683 users. Top-rated for **Todennäköisyys suosittelulle**. ----- ## Overview ### Kuka käyttää tuotetta Miro? Ohjelmistoyritykset (käyttökokemusten ja käyttöliittymien suunnittelijat, ketterät valmentajat, tuoteomistajat/tuotejohtajat), graafiset ja verkkosuunnittelupalvelut, markkinointi- ja mainostoimistot, luovat alat, konsultointi ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Yleinen** | **4.7/5** | 1683 Arvostelut | | Helppokäyttöisyys | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Asiakastuki | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Vastinetta rahalle | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Ominaisuudet | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Todennäköisyys suosittelulle) | ## Tietoja myyjästä - **Yritys**: Miro - **Location**: San Francisco, USA - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Lähtöhinta**: 10,00 $ - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Ilmainen kokeilu) - **Target Audience**: Itsetyöllistetyt, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Pilvi-, SaaS-, verkkopohjainen, Mac (pöytäkone), Windows (pöytäkone), Android (mobiili), iPhone (mobiili), iPad (mobiili) - **Supported Languages**: englanti, espanja, hollanti, japani, portugali, ranska - **Available Countries**: Afganistan, Ahvenanmaa, Alankomaat, Albania, Amerikan Samoa, Andorra, Anguilla, Antigua ja Barbuda, Arabiemiirikunnat, Argentiina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Azerbaidžan, Bahama, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgia, Belize and 156 more ## Ominaisuudet - Agendan hallinta - Aikaseuranta - Aikataulutus - Aivoriihet - Asiakirjojen tallennus - Datan hallinta - Diagrammien luonti - Digitaalinen kanvaasi - Esittelymallin luonti - Etätuki - Goal Setting/Tracking - Hallintapaneeli - Ideation - Ideoiden luokittelu - KPI-seuranta - Komponenttikirjasto - Käytettävyystestaus - Lankamallin luonti - Luonnostelu- ja annotointityökalut - Markkinoinnin kalenteri - Miellekartat - Mobiiliyhteys - Mukautettava hallintapaneeli - Mukautettavat mallit - Personalisointi - Priorisointi - Projektien suunnittelu/aikataulutus - Projektinhallinta - Prosessien mallinnus ja suunnittelu - Prosessikaavio - Prototyyppien luonti - Raportointi/analytiikka - Raportointi/projektien seuranta - Reaaliaikainen chat - Sisällönhallinta - Sprinttien suunnittelu - Suunnittelun hallinta - Task Editing - Tehtävänantojen hallinta - Tietojen visualisointi - Tietoliikenteen hallinta - Tietämyksen hallinta - Tuotteiden roadmapping - Työnkulkujen konfigurointi - Työntekijöiden valokuvat - Vedä ja pudota - Vedä ja pudota -toiminen muokkaus - Visuaalinen mallinnus - Visualisointi - Yhteistyövälineet ... and 85 more features ## Integrations (45 total) - Adobe Creative Cloud - Adobe XD - Airtable - Asana - Axure - BetterCloud - Bitium - Box - ClickUp - Coda - Confluence - Dialpad AI Meetings - Evernote Teams - Figma - Freshdesk ... and 30 more integrations ## Support Options - Sähköposti/Helpdesk - Usein kysytyt kysymykset / keskustelufoorumit - Tietämyskanta - 24/7 (asiakaspalvelija) - Chat ## Category - [Yhteistyö-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Aiheeseen liittyvät kategoriat - [Yhteistyö-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Sisäinen viestintä-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/31014/internal-communications/software) - [Idea Management-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/10027/idea-management/software) - [Valkotaulu-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/31995/whiteboard/software) - [Kokous-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/30802/meeting/software) ## Vaihtoehdot 1. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.fi/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (5945 reviews) 2. [Slack](https://www.capterra.fi/software/135003/slack) — 4.7/5 (24076 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.capterra.fi/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13557 reviews) 4. [Trello](https://www.capterra.fi/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23509 reviews) 5. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.fi/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3675 reviews) ## Arvostelut ### "Great tool for team collaboration" — 5.0/5 > **Vahvistettu arvostelija** | *24. huhtikuuta 2024* | Musiikki | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: It is a great tool for brainstorming ideas and getting everyone from the team to pitch in. You can also easily hold votes to gauge the team's opinion on any matters. We use it a lot for creative brainstorming. > > **Huonot puolet**: It has so many functionalities that it can feel a bit cumbersome and hard to use at times, specially for older team members. ----- ### "Smart choice for Project Management" — 4.0/5 > **Shrishail** | *3. maaliskuuta 2026* | Huonekalut | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Miro offers strong value for money, especially for teams needing a flexible collaborative whiteboard, though larger plans can be pricey. Customer support is responsive with solid documentation, but live help can be slow at peak times. The platform scores high on ease of use, with intuitive drag-and-drop tools and templates that reduce the learning curve. Organizational management features like team spaces and permissions help keep boards structured, while meetings feel more engaging with real-time co-editing and presentation modes. Workflow management integrates well with tools like Jira and Asana, making task tracking smoother. Overall navigation is clean and logical, though very large boards can occasionally feel cluttered. > > **Huonot puolet**: It gives the ready made templates for workflows, inbuilt AI features, and endless whiteboard. important is value for money. > > Wonderful experience in terms of project management, visual roadmap.It makes team collaboration, brainstorming, and meetings more interactive and organized. The interface is user-friendly, and real-time editing keeps everyone aligned. Overall, it’s a reliable and efficient tool for visual project management. ----- ### "miro review for pm" — 5.0/5 > **saidi** | *6. huhtikuuta 2026* | Animaatio | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Honestly, Miro just feels like the kind of tool that gets out of your way and lets you think. The canvas is huge, everything is drag and drop, and you never really feel boxed in by the structure of it. What I liked most though is how easy it is to get everyone involved — even people who aren't particularly "visual" types. You send someone a link, they jump in, and within two minutes they're adding sticky notes and moving things around like they've been using it for years. There's almost no learning curve, which is rare for a collaboration tool. The templates are also genuinely useful. Not just filler actual ready-to-go boards for things like retrospectives, brainstorming sessions, or roadmap planning that you can just pick up and run with. It makes remote collaboration feel less like a compromise and more like you're actually in the same room together. > > **Huonot puolet**: The one thing that got to me after a while is how heavy it can feel once your boards start filling up. Like, the more content you add, the slower things get especially if you're on a video call at the same time. It's not a dealbreaker but you do notice it. Also, the pricing. It's generous enough to get started, but the moment your team grows or you need some of the more advanced features, you're looking at a jump in cost that feels a bit steep. Feels like some things that should just be included are locked behind higher tiers. And honestly? Sometimes the amount of options and templates can be a little overwhelming. You open it up to do something simple and suddenly you're spending 20 minutes just picking a board layout. First world problem, I know but still. Nothing that made me want to stop using it, just small friction points that add up over time. > > Miro has genuinely changed how our team collaborates, especially working remotely. Before, aligning everyone on ideas or plans meant long email threads or meetings that could've been a document. Now we just open a board and figure things out together in real time. It became one of those tools that you don't realize how much you rely on until you try to work without it. Planning sessions, brainstorming, feedback rounds — it all just lives in Miro now and it makes everything feel a lot less scattered. It's not perfect, but it fits naturally into the way modern teams actually work, and that's honestly what matters most. ----- ### "Miro is a great way to visualize" — 3.0/5 > **Allen** | *2. joulukuuta 2025* | Tietokoneen ohjelmistot | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Miro can be an awesome tool for visualizing ideas and organizing thoughts. The features and plugins are great and the support from the customer support team has been great as well. > > **Huonot puolet**: Once you're in Miro, your data is kind of trapped in the application. There are ways to export but there are size limits on exporting. What makes it more difficult is that there is no way to track the overall size of your board while you're designing it so when it comes time to export, I find myself breaking things into many smaller boards or frames. If we knew this before trying Miro, we probably would have looked into alternatives. Now we feel stuck. > > Miro has been great for visualizing things for our customers. We have had some really great meetings due to Miro. When looking at this from a forward looking perspective though, Miro becomes a challenge to data security and data retention. ----- ### "Easy to use whiteboarding and charting tool with some administrative limitations" — 4.0/5 > **Matt** | *4. tammikuuta 2026* | Voittoa tuottamattomien järjestöjen hallinta | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: It is very easy to use. The click and drag interface and the templated actions make visualising data and concepts easy. It is also easy to share and collaborate with others. The free licence tier makes it easy for others to join in. > > **Huonot puolet**: Though the data in flowcharts and mind maps are in a structured hierarchy, Miro does not export the data in that structure. Especially for csv the data comes out in one column and in the order in which it was added to Miro, which is illogical. Items on the board that cross each other or overlap are difficult to work with as the item you want might be buried behind other items. Miro operates its layers like Powerpoint, which is equally difficult to use. I find myself sending foreground items to the back multiple times to get to the item I want. Miro is only two dimensional. In my mind maps I want to be able to provide more information about an item in the map but the only way to do that is to create another label or postit note. I would love to be able to provide depth to an item where someone could hover and read a description of that item. Also, from an administrators perspective Miro only makes content created by my organisation visible to me in the enterprise tier, which is expensive. I cannot see what my staff are doing in Miro, therefore handing over from one employee to another is very difficult. > > Miro has been a solid tool overall. It’s easy to use, makes it simple to visualise ideas using templates and drag-and-drop, and it’s great for sharing and collaborating. We’ve used it effectively to scope a CRM build and to map out requirements in a way that’s easy for others to understand. The main downsides are that structured diagrams don’t export in a useful hierarchy, overlapping items can be painful to work with because of the layers, and it would be better if you could add more detail to items without cluttering the board. ----- Page: 1 / 69\ Seuraava: [Next page](https://www.capterra.fi/software/128955/miro?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.fi/software/128955/miro) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data