--- description: Hanki yksityiskohtaista tietoa koskien tuotteen reqSuite® rm käytettävyyttä, ominaisuuksia, hintaa, hyötyjä ja huonoja puolia vahvistettujen käyttäjäkokemusten avulla. Lue arvosteluja ja löydä samankaltaisia työkaluja. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: reqSuite® rm Hinta, arvostelut ja arvosanat - Capterra --- Breadcrumb: [Kotisivu](/) > [Requirements Management Software](/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) > [reqSuite® rm](/software/162954/reqsuite) # reqSuite® rm Canonical: https://www.capterra.fi/software/162954/reqsuite Page: 1 / 3\ Seuraava: [Next page](https://www.capterra.fi/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) > Johtava RM-työkalu innovatiivisille keskisuurille yrityksille – helppokäyttöinen, tehokas, 100-prosenttisesti muokattavissa ja nopeasti käyttöönotettavissa > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 35 users. Top-rated for **Todennäköisyys suosittelulle**. ----- ## Overview ### Kuka käyttää tuotetta reqSuite® rm? reqSuite® rm:ään luottavat monilta eri toimialoilla toimivat yritykset. Yksinkertaisen ja laajan konfiguroitavuuden ansiosta se voidaan mukauttaa nopeasti ja täydellisesti kaikkiin yksittäisiin asiakastilanteisiin sopivaksi. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Yleinen** | **4.6/5** | 35 Arvostelut | | Helppokäyttöisyys | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Asiakastuki | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Vastinetta rahalle | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Ominaisuudet | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Todennäköisyys suosittelulle) | ## Tietoja myyjästä - **Yritys**: OSSENO Software GmbH - **Location**: Kaiserslautern, Saksa - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **Target Audience**: Itsetyöllistetyt, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Pilvi-, SaaS-, verkkopohjainen, Windows (paikallisesti hallinnoitu) - **Supported Languages**: englanti, ranska, saksa - **Available Countries**: Alankomaat, Belgia, Bulgaria, Espanja, Irlanti, Islanti, Iso-Britannia, Israel, Italia, Itävalta, Kanada, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Liettua, Luxemburg, Norja, Portugali, Puola, Ranska, Romania and 7 more ## Ominaisuudet - Asiakirjojen hallinta - Budjetointi/ennusteet - Edellytysten hallinta - Elinkaaren hallinta - Käyttöoikeuksien tarkistus / luvat - Muutosten hallinta - Priorisointi - Tehtävien etenemisen seuranta - Tehtävien hallinta - Työnkulkujen hallinta - Versiohallinta - Yhteistyövälineet ## Integrations (10 total) - Azure DevOps Server - ClickUp - Enterprise Architect - GitLab - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Redmine - TestRail ## Support Options - Sähköposti/Helpdesk - Usein kysytyt kysymykset / keskustelufoorumit - Tietämyskanta - Puhelintuki - Chat ## Category - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) ## Aiheeseen liittyvät kategoriat - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/10018/requirements-management/software) - [ALM-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/30525/application-lifecycle-management/software) - [Tuotteen elinkaarehallinta-ohjelmisto](https://www.capterra.fi/directory/30009/product-lifecycle-management/software) ## Vaihtoehdot 1. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.capterra.fi/software/173762/qtest) — 4.4/5 (27 reviews) 2. [monday.com](https://www.capterra.fi/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6013 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.capterra.fi/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15352 reviews) 4. [Confluence](https://www.capterra.fi/software/136446/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3678 reviews) 5. [monday dev](https://www.capterra.fi/software/1048457/monday-dev) — 4.6/5 (65 reviews) ## Arvostelut ### "Easy, flexible Customer Support and good value for Requirements Engineering\!" — 5.0/5 > **Leon** | *10. marraskuuta 2025* | Lääkinnälliset laitteet | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Great Customer Support, we got a very good package from the start as an early stage company and was greatly supported by \[sensitive content hidden\] himself. Especially for lean teams the software is very good suited, we worked with very holistic PLM tools before which would be an overkill for our team size. Team Collaboration works very good as well. > > **Huonot puolet**: The software could improve regarding usability and certain functionalities are not directly clear but apart from that we are happy with it. > > We are very happy to work with the ReqSuite team and their flexibility to react and find practical solutions. ----- ### "ReqSuite - easy to use, good features" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *5. toukokuuta 2025* | Uusiutuvat materiaalit ja ympäristö | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Easy to use, simple structure you can tailor to your needs. Great support from Osseno. Fast response to questions and issues. Onboarding process was smooth, efficient and helped us structure our product/requirements relationships. > > **Huonot puolet**: Some issues with the screen resolution. Minor issue that the responsible person for each requirement is not fixed and sometimes changes depending on the requirement state and user account rights (but this is already being worked on by Osseno for a future update) > > Great experience, so far. Moved to ReqSuite RM from excel and it has completely changed how we are able to record and track changes for our complex requirements set. The tool gives us all the features we need for this and is even adjustable enough for us to use for other related tasks such as FMECA, HAZID, etc. Simple to use which helps as we grow into our use of the tool. ----- ### "Powerful tool, sometimes frusturating." — 4.0/5 > **Alondra** | *13. maaliskuuta 2026* | Tutkimus | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: The versatility in all the different item types and links which can be created. It makes it easy to build up the database you need for your project. > > **Huonot puolet**: Slow and clumsy interface. For example, loading a given requirement takes several seconds. If items are sorted into sub folders, there's no easy way to see all the items within a parent folder. Importing items from other projects is not currently working. ----- ### "Poor user experience" — 1.0/5 > **Ilona** | *12. joulukuuta 2024* | Tietotekniikka ja tietopalvelut | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Methodology behind seems to be quite good, but the implementation is poor. Excel import/export is quite good as it allows me not to use ReqSuite. > > **Huonot puolet**: Terrible user experience - opening tickets only in one window - time consuming to do anything, several seconds to open another/parent ticket, no sensible tracking of dependencies (only direct links, so the most important info like full decomposition of requirements to system function or cross-dependenciess are not available) - everything needs to opened one by one which again takes time. Discussion/comment section is so tiny... Navigation in ticket detail is confusing and very annoying - when I open the detail in 1-window system, the search list is no longer visible until closing/minimizing the detail. Strange behaviour when updating decomposed issues - when I update one, it freezes the whole structure and it is not possible to work with them until it it propagates everything (which can take anything from 10s - 3mins) > > In short - very bad user experience and very unefficient tool for managing requirement. One-window is very 1995-like feature. Requires to spend hours and hours to manage simple structure this way. Use JIRA or Confluence instead... ----- ### "Easy to Use Requirements Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *20. helmikuuta 2026* | Suunnittelu | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Hyvät puolet**: Reqsuite is a great value with alot of capability for a very value oriented price. Some tools may have slightly more capabilities but have significantly more expense. The tool is quite intuitive to use overall and provides a great level of traceability. > > **Huonot puolet**: The ability to order created items in a drag/drop order is limited and can only be done via folders. This is a new feature that has been requested but is the largest challenge. > > The overall experience has been great. The support and answering questions has been very supportive overall. The tool is quite intuitive and most users are able to navigate it effectively with a basic level of training. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Seuraava: [Next page](https://www.capterra.fi/software/162954/reqsuite?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.fi/software/162954/reqsuite) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | da | | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fi | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nb | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data